Introduction
You're comparing equities across borders and need to know how exchange rates change your returns; currency fluctuation means movements in foreign-exchange rates that can raise or cut your realized equity returns even when local prices move the other way. To be clear, there are three different risks: transaction exposure (cash flows tied to FX-think receivables, payables, or one-off asset sales), translation exposure (accounting effects when foreign subsidiaries' financials convert into the parent currency), and economic exposure (long-term effects on a firm's competitiveness and future cash flows). Short take: currencies can change the picture as much as company fundamentals. This post covers the practical impact on listed domestic stocks, ADRs, and multinational issuers, with examples you can use to stress-test portfolios and defintely avoid simple mistakes.
Key Takeaways
- Currency moves can materially raise or cut realized equity returns-treat FX as a core risk factor alongside company fundamentals.
- There are three distinct FX exposures-transaction (cash flows), translation (reporting), and economic (long‑term competitiveness)-each needs different treatment.
- FX impacts both reported earnings (timing/translation) and intrinsic value via revenue/cost mismatches, free cash flow and discount rates-model in your DCFs and earnings forecasts.
- Hedging (forwards, options, natural/operational hedges) reduces volatility but has costs and limits-compare hedge premiums to expected currency drag and backtest effectiveness.
- Manage FX at the portfolio level: run 3‑scenario sensitivities and stress tests, use rolling regressions/VaR for measurement, and set clear FX policy, limits, ownership and reporting cadence (e.g., produce sensitivities within 10 business days).
Analyzing the Effects of Currency Fluctuation on Reported Earnings
You're reading this because currency moves are making reported earnings noisy, and you need clear steps to separate true operating performance from FX-driven accounting swings. Below I show how translation exposure works in consolidated financials, the simple math to quantify the swing, and how timing or one-off events change what you see in reported results.
Translation exposure and consolidated financial statements
Translation exposure (also called accounting translation) is the change in a parent company's reported financials when it converts a foreign subsidiary's local-currency financial statements into the parent's reporting currency.
Under both IFRS and US GAAP, companies typically translate a subsidiary whose functional currency is the local currency into the parent reporting currency. The balance sheet uses the closing (period-end) rate; the income statement often uses an average rate for the period. The resulting difference is recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) as a cumulative translation adjustment, unless a remeasurement triggers profit or loss when a subsidiary is sold.
Practical steps and best practices
- Map functional currencies for every legal entity.
- Tag P&L lines by currency in your chart of accounts.
- Translate balance sheet at period close; translate income statement at average rate.
- Report a monthly translation delta to management and reconcile to OCI.
- Disclose currency sensitivity in MD&A and notes.
One-liner: Translation shows up in OCI, not always in net income, so don't confuse accounting noise with operating profit changes.
Translation mechanics: foreign profit times FX change equals reported swing
The mechanics are straightforward: a foreign-currency profit translated into the parent currency changes proportional to the FX rate move. The quick formula is: translated swing = foreign profit × change in exchange rate (parent/local).
Example math using FY2025 numbers for clarity: assume a European subsidiary earned €50,000,000 in FY2025. If the USD/EUR rate used to translate moves from an average of 1.10 to the closing rate of 1.20 (USD strengthens), the translation swing is €50,000,000 × (1.20 - 1.10) = $5,000,000 increase in USD-reported results. Flip the move and the parent sees a USD decrease of the same amount.
Steps to calculate and present the effect
- Collect local-currency net income by legal entity for the reporting period.
- Choose the translation rates: average for P&L, closing for balance sheet.
- Compute translated income at both current and prior rates; the difference is the translation effect.
- Show a constant-currency column in your investor pack: translated at prior-year rates.
Best practices for investors and analysts
- Adjust EPS to constant-currency for trend analysis.
- Flag material translation swings (≥ 5% of reported net income).
- Note reclassification events: realized translation gains on sale hit P&L.
One-liner: Here's the quick math-local profit times the FX delta gives you the headline translation swing, so run that calc every period for your top 10 foreign subsidiaries.
Timing, quarter-versus-annual reporting and one-off versus recurring impacts
Timing matters. Quarterly reporting uses shorter averages and can amplify short-term volatility; annual reports smooth seasonality and may show a smaller net translation charge or credit for the year. One-offs - sale of a foreign unit, a large FX hedge settlement, or an impairment tied to exchange-rate-denominated cash flows - can move reported profit but don't reflect ongoing operating performance.
Concrete considerations and actions
- Run both quarterly and trailing-12-month (T12) constant-currency views.
- Separate recurring translation effects (periodic translation into OCI) from realized items (gain/loss on disposal or hedge settlement) in P&L.
- For seasonally concentrated subsidiaries, use weighted average rates matching revenue seasonality, not a flat quarter average.
- Track tax and minority interest effects when translating net income - they change the net impact on parent EPS.
Example sensitivity to guide governance: if a company reports $3,200,000,000 of FY2025 revenue from Europe, a 10% USD appreciation reduces reported USD revenue by roughly $320,000,000. If that drop would cut reported net income by more than 15%, set an action trigger for hedging or operational changes.
Steps to limit reporting surprises
- Institute monthly translation reporting for material currencies.
- Publish a constant-currency reconciliation each quarter.
- Set threshold-triggered reviews: if translation swing > 5% of net income, Finance and Treasury meet within 3 business days.
One-liner: Quarter-to-quarter FX noise can mask trends, so standardize constant-currency reporting and set materiality triggers for action - it's a small habit that avoids big surprises.
Next step: Portfolio or Finance lead - produce a translation sensitivity table for your top 10 foreign subsidiaries using FY2025 local profits and ±10% FX shocks within 7 business days.
How FX alters cash flows and valuations
You're evaluating foreign-exposed equities and want clear steps to translate currency moves into cash-flow and valuation effects so you can act; below I walk you through the practical mechanics, the math, and what to change in your models.
Revenue and cost currency mismatches
Start by mapping where invoices and costs are actually denominated, not by where sales happen. Revenue booked in a foreign currency but paid in your base currency creates different exposure than revenue invoiced and paid in that foreign currency.
Practical steps:
- List revenue by invoice currency for FY2025
- List costs (COGS, SG&A, capex) by invoice currency for FY2025
- Compute net operating exposure = % revenue in currency - % costs in same currency
- Flag residual exposures (taxes, dividends, intercompany flows)
Example (assumptions for an illustrative FY2025 case): company reports local-currency revenue of €1,200m, with 70% invoiced in euros and 30% invoiced in US dollars. Costs are split 50/50 between euros and dollars.
Here's the quick math: if EUR/USD moves from 1.10 to 1.00 (euro weakens ~9.09%), USD-reported revenue falls from $1,320m to $1,200m on the same euro figure, a USD drop of $120m. If costs are half in USD, the net USD earnings hit is lower but still material; net currency exposure roughly equals revenue-exposed share minus cost-exposed share, here ~20% of total top-line in USD terms.
What this estimate hides: timing mismatches (receipt lag), local pricing power, and pass-through ability; defintely test per-quarter flows.
One clear action: build a single-row currency exposure table for FY2025 showing euros, dollars, and other currencies as % of revenue and costs.
Impact on free cash flow and discount rates
Translate the operational exposure into projected free cash flow (FCF) in the base currency and then adjust discount rates for currency-related risk.
Step-by-step:
- Forecast FCF in local currencies for FY2026-2030
- Convert each year's FCF using scenario FX paths (spot, forward, stress)
- Recompute nominal WACC in the base currency
- Re-run DCF in base currency and compare constant-currency results
Worked example (assumptions): FY2025 local FCF = €150m. At EUR/USD 1.10 FCF = $165m. If euro weakens 10% to 1.00, FCF = $150m, a $15m cash reduction.
Discount-rate effects: when you discount in USD, use USD risk-free rates and a cost-of-equity that reflects local-currency volatility. If currency volatility rises, equity beta and sovereign/currency-premium often rise; a reasonable adjustment is to add a currency volatility premium of 50-150 basis points to WACC in high-volatility stress cases.
Here's the quick math on valuation impact: a $15m permanent reduction in annual FCF at a 8% WACC reduces terminal value by ~$187.5m (simple perpetuity = 15 / 0.08). What this hides: growth changes, cost pass-through, and capex timing.
One clean next step: re-run your DCF for the holding with three FX scenarios (base, -10%, -20%) and record the change in NPV and implied share price.
Link to valuation multiples and cross-border comparables
FX moves change the numerator (enterprise value in reporting currency) and the denominator (reported EBITDA, if translated), so multiples measured in a common currency can swing mechanically even if underlying operations are steady.
Concrete steps and best practices:
- Value peers in their reporting currencies first
- Convert peer EVs to your base currency using spot and stress FX
- Compare constant-currency EV/EBITDA and local-currency EV/EBITDA
- Adjust peer multiples for revenue-currency mix and operating leverage
Numeric example (illustrative): peer group aggregate EV = €3,000m and aggregate EBITDA = €300m → local EV/EBITDA = 10x. At EUR/USD 1.10, EV in USD = $3,300m and EV/EBITDA in USD = 11x. If EUR falls to 1.00, USD EV = $3,000m and EV/EBITDA = 10x. So FX alone can create a one-point multiple gap.
Practical guardrails:
- Use constant-currency multiples when comparing operational performance
- Adjust multiples for expected currency drift over the valuation horizon
- Prefer local-currency comparables for M&A or takeover math
One clean rule: when FX volatility > 5% annualized, show both local- and base-currency multiples to investors; investors will then see how much of any apparent multiple expansion is FX-driven.
Hedging strategies and their trade-offs
You're sizing FX risk across equity holdings and need a clear way to pick tools for the exposure, horizon, and cost you can tolerate; use forwards for predictable cash, options to cap downside, and operational (natural) hedges for long-term economic exposure. Here's the quick takeaway: match instrument to exposure type and time, and quantify the trade-off in expected P&L terms before you trade.
List instruments: forwards, options, natural hedges
Start by mapping the exposure: cash flows (transaction), reported P&L (translation), and longer-term competitiveness (economic). Then shortlist instruments that align to each exposure.
- Forwards (FX forwards) - contract to exchange currencies at a set rate on a future date; cheap (no upfront premium), bilateral or cleared, good for locking known receivables/payables.
- Options (FX options) - right but not obligation to exchange at strike; pay a premium up front, protect against adverse moves while allowing upside.
- Currency swaps - exchange principal and interest in different currencies; useful for matching foreign debt to local cash flows and for long-dated balance-sheet hedges.
- Natural hedges (operational) - match currency of revenues with costs, invoice in the same currency, locally source inputs, or use foreign-currency debt to fund foreign assets.
- Money market hedges - borrow or lend in the foreign currency to offset receivable/payable timing mismatches.
Practical steps: quantify exposure by currency and tenor, choose instrument by cost vs certainty, document counterparty limits, and define settlement/collateral rules before execution.
One-liner: use forwards for certainty, options for asymmetric protection, and natural hedges to cut recurring exposure.
Compare costs: hedge premiums vs expected currency drag
Put price on the decision: compare the explicit cost of hedging (premiums, carry, bid/ask, margin) to the expected drag from an adverse FX move on earnings or cash flow.
Step-by-step cost framework:
- Calculate expected annual currency loss = current exposure × expected move.
- Estimate hedge cost: forward cost ≈ interest-rate differential; option premium = market price (upfront), typically expressed as % of exposure.
- Compare net outcome: hedge cost vs expected loss over the same horizon, and include operational costs (systems, collateral, accounting).
Example (illustrative): you have $50m of EUR revenue in a USD-based portfolio and you expect a 10% EUR depreciation over a year. Expected earnings drag ≈ $5m. A 1‑year forward priced via carry of 3% costs ~$1.5m; a 1‑year put option might cost 2.5% (≈$1.25m premium). If you hedge with a forward you lock a known $1.5m cost vs an expected $5m loss - hedge looks attractive. What this estimate hides: volatility, roll costs if you hedge repeatedly, and potential favorable moves you give up.
Operational considerations: rolling short-term hedges can compound costs; options protect against tail events but erode returns if volatility is low; forwards can create mark-to-market volatility and margin calls.
One-liner: buy protection when the cost is less than the statistically expected hit and when the firm's risk budget can't absorb the worst case.
Explain operational hedges: pricing, sourcing, and invoice currency
Operational hedges change the economics without financial instruments. They're often the lowest-cost, durable solution for strategic equity exposures, but take time and negotiation.
Concrete steps to deploy operational hedges:
- Map flows: list revenues, costs, capex by currency and by legal entity for the next 12-36 months.
- Invoice currency: move pricing to the revenue currency where you can; target high-margin contracts first. Example: shift 50% of export invoices from EUR to USD to halve transaction exposure.
- Sourcing and supply chain: re-negotiate supplier contracts to match revenue currency, or source locally to reduce FX pass-through.
- Natural funding: use foreign-currency debt to match foreign assets and dividends-reduces translation and economic mismatch.
- Centralize FX netting: treasury should net intercompany flows monthly to reduce gross hedging needs.
Best practices: attach pass-through clauses for fuel or commodity-linked costs, set a target ratio (e.g., keep net open FX exposure 20% of EBITDA for major currencies), and track effectiveness quarterly. If implementation takes >90 days, estimate transitional exposure and consider temporary financial hedges.
One-liner: change contracts and flows first, hedge the remainder - operational fixes are cheaper but require governance and time.
Treasury: run a three-scenario cost/benefit (no-hedge, forward hedge, option hedge) on your top currency exposures and deliver numbers within 10 business days.
Portfolio-level effects and risk management
Show correlation changes: FX vs equities in stress periods
You should expect correlations between currencies and equity returns to shift during crises, and that shift matters for hedge sizing and risk limits.
Start by measuring rolling correlations between your portfolio returns and major FX rates (USD index, EUR/USD, JPY/USD) on 60- and 120-day windows. Use daily returns for short-term funds, weekly for long-only. Flag when correlations move more than 0.25 (25 percentage points) versus the 12-month median; that signals a regime change.
Step-by-step:
- Calculate daily returns for portfolio and each FX pair.
- Run rolling Pearson correlation, windows = 60 and 120 days.
- Create heatmap and trigger rule: if correlation change > 0.25, escalate to risk desk.
Practical checks: compute currency-driven P&L sensitivity by currency bucket: exposure × FX shock = expected P&L swing. For example, a 10% adverse move on a currency with $50m exposure implies ~$5m impact on NAV before hedging.
One clean line: watch correlations flip fast in stress; that's where you lose money if you're caught flat-footed.
Discuss diversification: home bias vs currency-agnostic allocations
If you hold foreign equities but don't manage currency, you're implicitly taking a separate FX bet; decide if you want that bet or not.
Best-practice options:
- Currency-aware allocation: allocate by real economic exposure, not just market cap.
- Currency-neutral allocation: hedge exposures to target local-equity returns only.
- Mixed approach: hedge a portion based on investment horizon and conviction.
Concrete rules to consider: for tactical funds, hedge 50-100% of short-term currency exposure; for long-term, hedge 0-50% depending on your view and the home-currency risk tolerance. Limit home bias by measuring country exposure in both local-currency and home-currency terms each month.
Example practice: rebalance quarterly if home-currency-adjusted allocation drifts > 3% of target; defintely rebalance faster if FX-driven drift exceeds 5%.
One clean line: decide if you want equity return or equity-plus-FX return-and stick to that decision with rebalancing rules.
Recommend governance: FX policy, limits, and reporting cadence
Policy clarity avoids ad-hoc hedging. Your FX policy should state objectives, allowed instruments, limits, and reporting cadence.
Minimum governance elements:
- Objective: preserve local-equity returns or accept FX as a return driver.
- Authorized instruments: forwards, FX swaps, options, natural hedges.
- Limits: max net open FX exposure by currency as %NAV (suggest 5% per currency, 20% aggregate), max daily trading notional.
- Counterparty rules: credit limits and approved bank list.
- Hedge effectiveness: target > 60% effectiveness over a rolling 12-month window for financial hedges.
- Escalation: trigger when hedge cost/benefit ratio exceeds preset thresholds.
Reporting cadence (sample):
- Daily: P&L and open FX notional for trading desks.
- Weekly: exposure map and hedging utilization for portfolio managers.
- Monthly: risk committee report with rolling correlations, stress losses at 1% and 5% VaR horizons.
- Quarterly: board-level review of policy and performance versus benchmarks.
Implementation steps:
- Draft FX policy within 5 business days.
- Set limits and automated alerts in risk system within 10 business days.
- Run initial backtest of hedge rules covering last 5 years and present results.
Owner and next step: Portfolio lead to produce a 3-scenario FX sensitivity for the top 10 foreign holdings and a draft FX policy; deliver within 10 business days to Finance for review.
Measuring and modeling FX impact
You need a repeatable framework that turns currency moves into dollar P&L and valuation deltas so you can act fast; below are concrete scenarios, tools, and backtests you can run this week.
Propose stress scenarios and sensitivity tables
Start by defining three to four scenarios that map to business decisions: base (spot/forwards), adverse (realistic stress), severe (tail shock), and an optional fwd-consistent (market-implied). A practical set: ±10%, ±25%, and ±40% moves versus spot for major currency pairs.
Here's the quick math to build a sensitivity row for one issuer: foreign operating profit × percent FX move = earnings swing in reporting currency. If local profit = 100 (local units) and spot = 1.00 USD/local, a -25% move in local currency per USD reduces converted profit to 75 USD (a 25 USD hit).
Follow these steps to create a 10-holding sensitivity table you can present to the board:
- Collect: revenue by currency and local operating profit
- Compute: net local exposure = local profit + net FX monetary items
- Apply: each scenario FX change to spot
- Convert: local profit × shocked FX to reporting currency
- Report: delta in USD and percent of market cap
Best practices: use consolidated line items, separate recurring vs one-off items, and tag contract-level FX clauses so you don't double-count exposures.
One-liner: build a scenario table that maps currency shocks to dollar P&L and % of market cap.
Recommend tools: rolling regressions, value-at-risk, DCF with currency layers
Use three complementary toolsets so you cover correlation, tail risk, and intrinsic value.
Rolling regressions: run rolling OLS of issuer returns on local equity returns and currency returns (log returns). Use a 36-month window with monthly data to capture regime shifts; report rolling beta to currency and rolling R-squared. This shows time-varying sensitivity: if currency beta moves from 0.2 to 0.6, currency explains more of equity swings.
Value-at-Risk (VaR) and stress VaR: compute parametric (variance-covariance) VaR for short horizons (<1 month) and historical or Monte Carlo VaR for longer horizons. Use both 95% and 99% confidence levels. Steps:
- Assemble joint return series: equity local, FX
- Estimate covariance matrix and marginal volatilities
- Compute portfolio VaR (parametric) and run historical shocks
- Compare to stress VaR from scenario shocks
DCF with currency layers: project free cash flow (FCF) in local currency, model three FX rate paths (spot-forward, PPP-adjusted, and stressed paths), convert each FCF path to reporting currency, and discount in reporting currency using WACC adjusted for currency-country risk. Practical rule: keep cash-flow projection currency-consistent; do not mix local cash flows with a discount rate priced in another currency without explicit currency premium.
Tooling stack recommendations: Python/R for regressions and Monte Carlo, Excel for sensitivity tables and DCF scenarios, and a risk system (Bloomberg/Refinitiv/NAV) for market-implied forwards and vol surfaces. Integrate outputs into your portfolio dashboard.
One-liner: combine rolling betas, VaR, and DCF-with-currency scenarios to triangulate risk and value.
Explain backtesting: historical shocks and hedge effectiveness
Backtest two things: how past FX shocks would have moved your P&L, and whether hedges would have reduced that movement. Use event windows and holdout periods.
Steps to backtest historical shocks:
- Select shocks: 2008 Global Crisis, 2015 CHF shock, 2016 Brexit, 2020 COVID, 2022-23 USD surge
- Recreate P&L: apply historical FX rates to recorded local FCF/profit series
- Measure impact: compute absolute and %-of-market-cap deltas
- Attribute: separate cash flow changes from translation effects
Hedge-effectiveness test (practical formula): Hedge Effectiveness = 1 - (Volatility after hedge / Volatility before hedge). Example: unhedged P&L vol = 8%, hedged vol = 3% → effectiveness = 62.5%. What this estimate hides: transaction costs, basis risk, and rebalancing timing.
Run a counterfactual hedge simulation: pick the hedge instrument (forwards, options, or option collars), simulate execution costs (bid/ask, margin), and recompute P&L under historical rates. Use daily or weekly rebalancing rules you'd actually follow.
Report backtest outputs in three panels: unhedged P&L distribution, hedged P&L distribution, and cost-benefit (hedge cost vs avoided loss). Use percentiles (P50, P95, P99) to show tail protection.
One-liner: backtest hedges against real shocks and report volatility reduction, cost, and tail outcomes - then decide.
Next step: run the three scenario sensitivity table for your top 10 FX-exposed holdings and send results to Portfolio: lead within 10 business days.
Currency FX: decision checklist and next steps
Summarize key decision points for investors and finance teams
You're deciding how much FX risk to accept and where to act - hedge, diversify, or monitor.
Focus on three concrete decision points:
- Measure exposure: map FY2025 foreign revenue, EBIT, and free cash flow by currency.
- Set action thresholds: pick triggers for tactical hedging and operational changes.
- Choose governance: define who signs off on hedges, limits, and reporting cadence.
Here's the quick math for a single line: change in FX (%) × FY2025 foreign line item (USD) = P&L swing (USD).
Practical thresholds I recommend: trigger review if EPS or FCF swings by more than ±5%; place tactical hedges when expected currency drag exceeds 0.5% of portfolio NAV annualized.
What this estimate hides: exposure concentration, timing mismatches, and pass-through pricing capacity - these need line-item checks per issuer, not portfolio averages.
Give next step: run a 3-scenario FX sensitivity on your top 10 foreign holdings
Do this now: run a three-scenario sensitivity on your top 10 non‑USD holdings using each issuer's FY2025 numbers (revenue, EBIT, FCF, shares outstanding, net debt).
- Scenarios: Adverse (local currency weakens by -15% vs USD), Base (spot FX at FY2025 close), Favorable (local currency strengthens by +10%).
- Outputs per security: revenue delta (USD), EBIT delta (USD), EPS delta (USD and %), free cash flow delta (USD and %), implied valuation multiple change (EV/EBIT or P/E).
- Assumptions to record: FY2025 tax rate, share count, pass‑through rate (what percent of price moves pass to consumers), and hedging currently in place.
- Deliverable format: single spreadsheet with one tab per issuer and a summary tab with portfolio-weighted impacts and waterfall chart.
Here's the quick math example to copy into the sheet: if FY2025 foreign revenue = R, FX change = Δ (as decimal), then revenue impact = R × Δ; if margin = m, then EBIT impact ≈ R × Δ × m (adjust for cost currency mix).
What to watch: use FY2025 actuals for accuracy; if FY2025 had one-offs, neutralize them so sensitivities show recurring exposure. Also run a quick check using a -25% tail shock for stress testing.
Assign owner: Portfolio or Finance lead to produce the sensitivity within 10 business days
Owner and deadline: Finance lead produces the detailed sensitivity workbook; Portfolio lead reviews and signs off on recommended hedging/tilts within 10 business days.
- Day 0: Finance pulls FY2025 financials and current FX rates.
- Day 2: Finance populates issuer tabs and runs the three scenarios.
- Day 6: Portfolio reviews results, flags top 3 exposures and recommends actions (hedge, operational fix, or do nothing).
- Day 10: Joint finance+portfolio meeting to approve actions and set reporting cadence.
One clean action line: Finance: deliver the sensitivity workbook; Portfolio: approve actions by the 10th business day - do it now, not later.
Practical note: if data gaps appear for any issuer's FY2025 numbers, mark items as incomplete and escalate to the issuer coverage analyst - don't guess the numbers; get them from filings or investor relations. (Yes, that extra call pays off.)
![]()
All DCF Excel Templates
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.